Climate Change and Violent Conflict Part 1
In my previous blog posts, I have dealt with the
direct consequences of climate change in South Africa, such as droughts and
floods. In this blog post, I will look one step further and consider the
climate change – conflict nexus. Where my previous posts were focused on South
Africa, this blog post will be about a different region in Africa. The
literature I use for this blogpost focusses on East Africa. Besides, for
examples and a more narrow focus, I will in my next blogpost look at Sudan and
South Sudan particularly.
Although it is still fairly uncertain how much climate
change will increase the risk of conflict, it is highly expected by researches
that the risk of violent conflict will increase (Stanford, 2019). The
availability or better said the unavailability of renewable resources is a
common conflict driver. With climate change affecting the availability of
renewable resources, it is important to consider the potential links between climate
change and violent conflict. East Africa is a good case for researching the
climate – conflict nexus because of its high risk of climate-related conflict
because of multiple factors. The large history of violence in the region and
high climate change risk together with high vulnerability to climate change
because of poverty and limited adaptive capacities make the region at risk (van Baalen & Mobjôrk, 2018).
The climate Change – Violent Conflict Nexus
According to literature, there are four key explanations
connecting climate change to violent conflict in East Africa. These are (1) the
worsening livelihood conditions, (2) increased migration and changing pastoral
mobility patterns, (3) tactical considerations by armed groups and (4) elite
exploitation of local grievance (van Baalen & Mobjôrk, 2018, p.551). These
explanations are not contradictory, they often exist together or at different
moments.
Worsening livelihood conditions
Worsening livelihood conditions is a big possible
reason for violent conflict. Households depending on renewable natural
resources are particularly vulnerable. This is because climate change is expected to decrease
the availability or quality of freshwater and have impacts on food security
because of the degradation of grazing lands, damaged croplands, and dead livestock.
In East Africa, a big part of the population depends on rain-fed agriculture
and pastoralism, which will be highly impacted by climate change. It is
expected that especially resulted loss of income for farmers and pastoralists
together with other political/social pressures on livelihood can fuel violent
conflict in which people try to secure resources (van Baalen & Mobjôrk,2018). However, the link to worsening livelihood conditions and violent
conflict is largely affected by a widely amount of other factors such as a
dependence on natural resources, adaptation capacity, government policies, and
marginalization and therefore differs a lot between communities (van Baalen& Mobjôrk, 2018). Vulnerable places with a history of violence are more
likely to be the site of new conflict.
Migration
Climate-related environmental change is almost always
just one of the multiple factors that lead people to migrate. Moreover, a
sudden disaster like a flood impacts migration differently, with immediate
displacement, than slow-onset disasters. The more slow processes, such as
increasing resource scarcity, push people towards areas with more resources
available or different livelihood possibilities, such as urban areas (van Baalen & Mobjôrk, 2018). In this way, climate change can increase
urbanization processes. Also, pastoralists depending on seasonal mobility have
to change routes because of the frequent unavailability of pasture and water. Migration can lead to conflict In multiple ways. Firstly, in-migration can
place stress on the resources, increasing the risk of conflict. Secondly, when
migrants with different ethnic backgrounds migrate to a place, this can lead to
ethnic tension (van Baalen & Mobjôrk, 2018).
Tactical Considerations by armed groups
The influence of climate variability on tactical
considerations by armed groups is central in this argument. The climate
influences the tactical considerations in the mobility of forces and material
and level of camouflage (van Baalen & Mobjôrk, 2018).
Elite Exploitation of Local Grievances
Elite exploitation of local grievances happens when
organized elite groups fuel intergroup violence to effectively use them in
civil wars or ethnic cleansing to for example crush political opponents (van
Baalen & Mobjôrk, 2018). This argument is particularly important because
conflict as a result of climate change happens in a political world with social
processes of human behavior. Conditions like elite exploitation set the scene
for the extreme outcome of violent conflict.
These four arguments help understand climate change –
violent conflict nexus, yet it is important to realize that societies
vulnerable to climate change might also make them vulnerable to violent
conflict and the other way around, violent conflict makes communities more
defenseless to climate change.
Comments
Post a Comment